1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 8 F.Supp.
  5. 8 F.Supp. 951 (1934)
 

THE IDA

No. 13973.

8 F.Supp. 951 (1934)

THE IDA. COMPAGNIE D'ENTREPRISES COMMERCIALES EN EGYPTE v. COSULICH SOCIETA TRIESTINA DE NAVIGAZIONE.

District Court, E. D. New York.

June 6, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hill & Rivkins, of New York City (Robert E. Hill, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City (L. de Grove Potter and William H. Postner, both of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion for an interlocutory decree in favor of libelant on the ground that the respondent's answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a legal defense to the cause of action and on the further ground that the respondent's answer admits facts which entitle libelant to an interlocutory decree as a matter of law.

In the amended libel it is alleged that on June 1, 1933,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases