1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 9 F.Supp.
  5. 9 F.Supp. 917 (1934)
 

DRUGGIST SPECIALTIES CO. v. BLISS

No. 8139.

9 F.Supp. 917 (1934)

DRUGGIST SPECIALTIES CO., Inc., v. BLISS et al.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

June 18, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Malis, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

B. M. Ilderton and Edward C. Dougherty, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants District Supervisor and Commissioner of Industrial Alcohol.

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This bill should be sustained.

Discussion.

The case is a revocation of a permit case. We shall treat it, however, as if it were the refusal of an original permit. If an original permit could not be refused, a fortiori a revocation would be unjustified. The permittee has held a permit for thirteen years. It is accused of having, when the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) was in force, been a party to law violations by selling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases