1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 72 F.2d
  5. 72 F.2d 831 (1934)
 

HORTON v. HORTON

No. 5921.

72 F.2d 831 (1934)

HORTON v. HORTON et al.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided August 6, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark P. Friedlander, of Washington, D. C., Bernard H. Conn, of Baltimore, Md., and Irving S. Rose, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Ringgold Hart and John J. Carmody, both of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

An appeal from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint for want of substance.

The appellant was plaintiff in the lower court and his brother was the principal defendant. The term "defendant," when used in this opinion, means plaintiff's brother, notwithstanding that M. E. Horton, Inc., is also a defendant in the case. The plaintiff in his bill of complaint alleged, among other things, that in the year 1918, when both parties were engaged in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases