1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 68 F.2d
  5. 68 F.2d 829 (1934)
 

NACHMAN SPRING-FILLED CORP. v. SPRING PRODUCTS CORP.

No. 161.

68 F.2d 829 (1934)

NACHMAN SPRING-FILLED CORPORATION v. SPRING PRODUCTS CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 22, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmond Quincy Moses, of New York City (R. W. Lotz, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellant.

Duell, Dunn & Anderson, of New York City (Holland S. Duell, Samuel S. Marcus and David S. Kane, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The patent in suit, No. 1,411,227, for a spring cushion construction, has two claims, both charged to be infringed. It has had great commercial success because it is cheaper and better for use than prior constructions. It was held valid below but not infringed.

The novelty claimed for it is that it embodies a complete permanently assembled spring casing containing complete individual pockets...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases