1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 72 F.2d
  5. 72 F.2d 755 (1934)
 

UNITED STATES v. AMALGAMATED SUGAR CO.

No. 1036.

72 F.2d 755 (1934)

UNITED STATES v. AMALGAMATED SUGAR CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

September 12, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Waldo, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dan B. Shields, U. S. Atty., of Salt Lake City, Utah, and J. Louis Monarch, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for the United States.

Emmett M. Bagley, of Salt Lake City, Utah (Robert L. Judd and Paul H. Ray, both of Salt Lake City, Utah, on the brief), for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, McDERMOTT, and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Acting under the provisions of section 274 of the Revenue Act of 1924 (43 Stat. 297, 26 USCA §§ 1048-1051 notes, 1052, 1053 note, 1054), the Commissioner of Internal Revenue laid a deficiency income and excess profits tax of $210,810.56 for the year 1918 against the Amalgamated Sugar Company, hereinafter called the company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Utah, with its domicile at Ogden within that state. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases