BEE LINE TRANSP. CO. v. CONNECTICUT FIRE INS. CO.

No. 14110.

6 F.Supp. 816 (1934)

BEE LINE TRANSP. CO. v. CONNECTICUT FIRE INS. CO. OF HARTFORD.

District Court, E. D. New York.

May 8, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Single, Atkins & Tyler, of New York City (Christopher E. Heckman, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City (George S. Brengle, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.


BYERS, District Judge.

Hearing on exceptions to answer which pleads no defense, and puts libelant to its formal proof.

The libelant seeks to recover from the respondent the amount alleged to be due under a marine insurance policy because of the following circumstances:

The libelant's tug Wyoming in November of 1927 was towing four vessels containing coal, including its own numbered barges 801 and 806; these...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases