1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 9 F.Supp.
  5. 9 F.Supp. 767 (1934)
 

E. F. HAUSERMAN CO. v. WRIGHT METAL, INC.

No. 1011.

9 F.Supp. 767 (1934)

E. F. HAUSERMAN CO. v. WRIGHT METAL, Inc., et al.

District Court, W. D. New York.

On Motion to Reopen and Reargue November 13, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Popp & Powers, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Fay, Oberlin & Fay, John F. Oberlin, and Joseph G. Fogg, all of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff.

George M. Blackmon, of Jamestown, N. Y. (Austin & Dix, Albert M. Austin, and Reuben T. Carlson, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The suit is in equity for infringement of 9 several patents including 44 claims. E. F. Hauserman, plaintiff, is an Ohio corporation with its place of business located at Cleveland, in that state. Wright Metal, Inc., defendant, is a New York corporation, with its principal place of business at Falconer, in that state. Defendant Samuel J. Lasser is an assignee for benefit of creditors of Wright Metal, Inc., and is in the active conduct of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases