1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 9 F.Supp.
  5. 9 F.Supp. 61 (1934)
 

IN RE STACY

9 F.Supp. 61 (1934)

In re STACY.

District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

December 26, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Strong, Covell & Strong, of Minneapolis, Minn. (Thos. P. Welch, of Buffalo, Minn., of counsel), for petitioners.

Henry Spindler, of Buffalo, Minn. (C. A. Pidgeon, of Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel), for bankrupt.

Harry H. Peterson, Atty. Gen., and Matthias N. Orfield, Asst. Atty. Gen., amicus curiæ for the bankrupt.

MOLYNEAUX, District Judge.

The proceeding is before the court upon an order to show cause issued by the court on the petition of Louis D. Roberge and Sarah Roberge, requiring the bankrupt to show cause why the court should not make its order:

1. Dismissing the petition of Sherman U. Stacy, bankrupt, as to the petitioners, Louis D. Roberge and Sarah Roberge and as to the land involved described in the petition.

2. Enjoining and prohibiting the bankrupt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases