1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 6 F.Supp.
  5. 6 F.Supp. 689 (1934)
 

CORPORATION OF THE R. E. ASSURANCE v. UNITED STATES

6 F.Supp. 689 (1934)

CORPORATION OF THE ROYAL EXCHANGE ASSURANCE v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 8, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City (Henry N. Longley and Alfred Ogden, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

Thomas E. Dewey, U. S. Atty., of New York City (O. P. M. Brown and F. R. Conway, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondents.

COXE, District Judge.

These exceptions challenge the sufficiency of the libels in two suits for cargo loss brought under the 1932 Amendment to the Suits in Admiralty Act (USCA title 46, § 745), on the ground that the prior actions were commenced more than six years after the respective claims first accrued. USCA title 28, § 262. The libels are substantially identical except that in one the United States is the respondent, and in the other the Shipping Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases