1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 71 F.2d
  5. 71 F.2d 622 (1934)
 

WALKER v. LEE

No. 7289.

71 F.2d 622 (1934)

WALKER v. LEE et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 11, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chas. E. Townsend and Wm. A. Loftus, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Rector, Hibben, Davis & Macauley, Frank Parker Davis, and Harry W. Lindsey, Jr., all of Chicago, Ill., and Charles M. Fryer and A. C. Aurich, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court entered July 25, 1933, denying plaintiff's motion to retax the costs after the cause was remanded to the district court by this court. The principal complaint of the appellant is as to items of expense, amounting to $542.55, for the taking of depositions in an interference proceeding in the Patent Office between appellant Walker and one Chase. The appellant claims that as these depositions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases