IN RE KLEIN

Nos. 3525, 3540.

9 F.Supp. 57 (1934)

In re KLEIN et al.

District Court, D. Minnesota, Second Division.

December 22, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry H. Peterson, Atty. Gen., and Matthias N. Orfield, Asst. Atty. Gen., amici curiæ, for petitioners Klein.

Meighen, Knudson & Sturtz, of Albert Lea, Minn., for Insurance Company.


NORDBYE, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The sufficiency of the first objection urged by the insurance company must be determined in light of subsections (n) and (o) of section 75 (11 USCA § 203 (n, o), Agricultural Compositions and Extensions. These two subsections read as follows:

"(n) The filing of a petition pleading for relief under this section shall subject the farmer and his property, wherever located, to the exclusive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases