1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 68 F.2d
  5. 68 F.2d 564 (1934)
 

UNITED ENGINEERING & FOUNDRY CO. v. COLD METAL PROCESS CO.

No. 5233.

68 F.2d 564 (1934)

UNITED ENGINEERING & FOUNDRY CO. v. COLD METAL PROCESS CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

January 3, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Leo Weil and J. Smith Christy, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., Melville Church, of Washington, D. C., and Jo. Baily Brown and Paul N. Critchlow, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

Byrnes, Stebbins, Parmelee & Blenko, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, and John J. Heard, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below the Cold Metal Process Company, hereafter called plaintiff, assignee and owner of patent No. 1,779,195, granted October 21, 1930, to Abram Steckel for method and apparatus for rolling thin sheetlike metal, filed a bill against the United Engineering & Foundry Company, hereafter called defendant, and therein alleged defendant had infringed such patent "by wrongfully and without license making and selling rolling mills...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases