PROSPERITY CO. v. AMERICAN LAUNDRY MACHINERY CO.

No. 628.

7 F.Supp. 585 (1934)

PROSPERITY CO., Inc., v. AMERICAN LAUNDRY MACHINERY CO.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

April 27, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wood & Wood, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Wm. R. Wood, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Bohleber & Ledbetter, J. C. Ledbetter, and Francis H. Fassett, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Allen & Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Marston Allen and Peck, Shaffer & Williams, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Brockett, Hyde, Higley & Meyer and Elbert L. Hyde, all of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for defendant.


NEVIN, District Judge.

This cause is now before the court on a motion filed on behalf of plaintiff herein for a decree dismissing defendant's counterclaim based on Benjamin patent, No. 1,167,475, on the ground that the same is not properly a counterclaim "arising out of the same transaction," and that Equity Rule 30 was not intended to permit a defendant to acquire a patent after suit and thereafter set the same up as a counterclaim.

The record shows that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases