LITTLETON, Judge.
This case presents two questions, namely, whether the claim for refund filed February 18, 1925, was sufficient in law to entitle plaintiff to a refund for 1919 based upon a proration to invested capital for that year of the correct tax for 1917 and 1918 after special assessment for those years had been allowed and the tax theretofore paid on the return and the additional tax collected by credit were found to be greatly in excess of the tax due, and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
