MAGNAVOX CO. v. HART & RENO

Nos. 7283, 7284.

73 F.2d 433 (1934)

MAGNAVOX CO. v. HART & RENO et al. SAME v. ERNEST INGOLD, Inc. SAME v. STROMBERG-CARLSON TELEPHONE MFG. CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 29, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Townsend and Wm. A. Loftus, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

George L. Wilkinson and Howard W. Hodgkins, both of Chicago, Ill., and Charles M. Fryer, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees Hart & Reno.

John H. Miller and A. W. Boyken, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees Ernest Ingold and Stromberg-Carlson.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.


SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

Three suits on three patents, brought by the same plaintiff, the appellant herein, against ten defendants, the appellees, are presented to us for consideration on two appeals. Because of the interrelationship of interests and of subject-matter, we are passing upon both appeals jointly.

All three actions involve alleged infringement of the appellant's patents, which in terms cover telephone electrodynamic and amplifying receivers, but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases