1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 71 F.2d
  5. 71 F.2d 423 (1934)
 

DOUGHNUT MACH. CORPORATION v. JOE-LOWE CORPORATION

No. 3487.

71 F.2d 423 (1934)

DOUGHNUT MACH. CORPORATION v. JOE-LOWE CORPORATION et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

June 11, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Josiah W. Bailey, of Raleigh, N. C., and Frank B. Fox, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Henry N. Paul, of Philadelphia, Pa., O. B. Duckett, Jr., of Annapolis, Md., Fraley & Paul, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Adams & Hargest, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant.

Edwin F. Samuels and Charles Markell, both of Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

Before PARKER and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

A further consideration of the questions involved in this case, in the light of the briefs and arguments on rehearing, convinces us of the correctness of the opinion heretofore filed. The principal argument of the appellant upon rehearing is that the combination covered by the claims relied on is patentable because of its inclusion of a new cutting device consisting of a cutter disc and sleeve, both with sharp cutting edges. Indeed, one of counsel for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases