1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 74 F.2d
  5. 74 F.2d 381 (1934)
 

WANDTKE v. ANDERSON

No. 7437.

74 F.2d 381 (1934)

WANDTKE v. ANDERSON et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 21, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. W. Hutton, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Thacher, Jones & Casey, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees Anderson and others.

Resleure, Vivell & Pinckney, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Oakley.

Before WILBUR and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.

GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the decree of the District Court which allowed and approved the findings and conclusions of the Commissioner in determining that appellee Arthur Oakley was not a captain or master of the boat or scow Mary E, but merely an operator, engineer, or stevedore, and as such entitled to priority over certain other claimants.

The Mary E was a motorboat of 67 gross tons, 48 net tons, 60.1 feet in length, 25.8 feet in width...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases