1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 71 F.2d
  5. 71 F.2d 306 (1934)
 

BEATIE v. POLLOCK

Patent Appeal No. 3320.

71 F.2d 306 (1934)

BEATIE v. POLLOCK.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 12, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund G. Borden, of New York City (J. Austin Stone, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Charles M. Thomas and James P. Burns, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

An interference proceeding was instituted in the United States Patent Office between the application of Cecil E. Beatie, No. 400,531, filed July 31, 1920, and the patent of the appellee, Robert T. Pollock, 1,783,259, issued December 2, 1930, on an application filed November 14, 1929. The subject-matter of the interference was expressed in two counts, which are as follows:

"1. The process of converting heavy hydrocarbon oils into oils...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases