1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 69 F.2d
  5. 69 F.2d 283 (1934)
 

PATENTS PROCESS v. DURST

No. 7053.

69 F.2d 283 (1934)

PATENTS PROCESS, Inc., et al. v. DURST et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 23, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hiram E. Casey, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Henry E. Bianchi, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before WILBUR and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Patents Process, Inc., a corporation, is the alter ego of Frank D. Williams. Bankruptcy proceedings were filed against both and the proceedings were consolidated. The adjudication of bankruptcy was made on November 14, 1929. Prior thereto an action had been brought by Mildred E. Williams against Frank D. Williams and Patents Process, Inc. Harry Schenck was appointed receiver for the Patents Process, Inc. After the election and qualification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases