1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 69 F.2d
  5. 69 F.2d 264 (1934)
 

HARRIS & SCHAFER v. CURTISS AEROCAR CO.

No. 7212.

69 F.2d 264 (1934)

HARRIS & SCHAFER, Inc., v. CURTISS AEROCAR CO., Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 8, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. H. Redfearn, of Miami, Fla., for appellant.

Marshall C. Wiseheart, Jr., and Malcolm B. Wiseheart, both of Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before BRYAN, SIBLEY, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

Curtiss Aerocar Company by its bill sought an account of profits from and an injunction against infringement by Harris & Schafer, Inc., of two patents, Nos. 85816 and 85815, covering designs for a trailer vehicle and a tow car and trailer combination. An injunction was decreed, but no profits or damages. Harris & Schafer, Inc., appeals, contending mainly that complainant had no title to the patents, that the designs were not patentable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases