MAGNANO CO. v. HAMILTON

No. 589.

292 U.S. 40 (1934)

A. MAGNANO CO. v. HAMILTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON, ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 2, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Otto B. Rupp, with whom Messrs. Alfred J. Schweppe, A.M. Davis, and W.R. Brown were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. E.P. Donnelly, Assistant Attorney General of Washington, and Mr. Philip D. Macbride, with whom Mr. G.W. Hamilton, Attorney General, was on the brief. for appellees.


MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant assails as invalid a statute of the State of Washington which levies an excise tax of fifteen cents per pound on all butter substitutes sold within the state. Every distributor of such butter substitutes is required to file a duly acknowledged certificate with the Director of Agricultural, containing the name under which the distributor is transacting business with the state and other specified information...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases