1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 73 F.2d
  5. 73 F.2d 225 (1934)
 

UNITED STATES v. GENERAL RUBBER CO.

Customs Appeals Nos. 3800, 3801.

73 F.2d 225 (1934)

UNITED STATES v. GENERAL RUBBER CO. GENERAL RUBBER CO. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

October 30, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph R. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Daniel P. McDonald, Sp. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Joseph F. Lockett, of Boston, Mass., and Arthur & Dry, of New York City (Paul H. Arthur and H. P. Sadtler, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), and F. R. Wahl and Robert E. Sheldon, both of Akron, Ohio, for General Rubber Co.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

These cases involve an appeal by the United States and a cross-appeal by the General Rubber Company (hereinafter referred to as importer) from a judgment of the United States Customs Court (Second Division), one judge dissenting, which sustained importer's protest against the assessment of duty of 7 cents per pound under paragraph 783, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 USCA § 1001 par. 783), on 193 bales of Egyptian cotton.

Paragraph 783...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases