AMREIN FREUDENBERG CO. v. GARFIELD


6 F.Supp. 19 (1934)

AMREIN FREUDENBERG CO., Inc., v. GARFIELD et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 15, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fritz Ziegler, Jr., of New York City, for plaintiff.

Glass & Lynch, of New York City (Leslie Kirsch and Sydney W. Cable, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.


WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My judgment in this case is that the plaintiff should have a decree. I will deal with the details thereof later in my opinion.

I. Perhaps I should first dispose of the question of infringement.

It is argued by the counsel for the defendants that the patent does not properly cover or disclose any design for an appliqué, which is what was made by the plaintiff as shown by Plaintiff's Exhibit 10, and copied by the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases