SUISMAN & BLUMENTHAL v. EATON

No. 3501.

8 F.Supp. 217 (1934)

SUISMAN & BLUMENTHAL, Inc., v. EATON, Collector of Internal Revenue.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

October 8, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles C. Pearce, of New York City (Henry M. Gretsch, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and S. E. Blackham, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Frank S. Bergin, U. S. Atty., and George H. Cohen, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Hartford, Conn., for defendant.


THOMAS, District Judge.

This is a suit to recover $4,090.54 alleged to have been erroneously collected from the plaintiff as additional income taxes and interest, for the year 1923.

The question presented is whether plaintiff, a parent corporation, is entitled to deduct from its gross income the difference between $57,000, which represents the price paid for 927 shares of stock of Hartford Electric Steel Corporation, a subsidiary of the parent company, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases