SYMES, District Judge.
The issues presented in this action are: (1) The validity of complainant's patent No. 1,926,900, dated September 12, 1933, application filed November 19, 1931; and (2) its infringement by defendants.
Admitting the application and issuance of the patent, defendants deny generally any infringement, and affirmatively allege the device is not a patentable invention within the meaning of the statutes, because it is so nearly like devices...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
