1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 70 F.2d
  5. 70 F.2d 115 (1934)
 

FINK v. HUMEL

Patent Appeal No. 3262.

70 F.2d 115 (1934)

FINK v. HUMEL.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 16, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Grindle, of Washington, D. C. (Frank J. Kent and Charles F. Chisholm, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Harry Cohen, of Washington, D. C. (Guido M. Sacerdote, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is an interference proceeding in which an appeal was taken to this court from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority to the junior party Humel.

The subject-matter of the invention is a metal strip for use in laying terrazzo floors. Five counts appear to be involved, although only two...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases