1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 70 F.2d
  5. 70 F.2d 110 (1934)
 

EUTH v. OLIVER

Patent Appeal No. 3242.

70 F.2d 110 (1934)

EUTH v. OLIVER.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 16, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dyrenforth, Lee, Chritton & Wiles, of Chicago, Ill. (John H. Lee, Horace Dawson, and Bernard A. Schroeder, all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellant.

L. G. Miller, of Boston, Mass. (Emery, Booth, Varney & Townsend, of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

An interference proceeding was instituted in the United States Patent Office between the application for a patent of the appellant, John E. Euth, filed February 6, 1930, and the pending application of the appellee, Walter E. Oliver, filed January 29, 1929, for a similar invention. The subject-matter of the interference was set out in five counts, which are as follows:

"1. In a mechanism for feeding perforated strips of material, a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases