PER CURIAM.
The question before the district judge rested in his discretion, and we should not disturb his decision unless that discretion was plainly abused. The threatened wrong was the approval of the proposed plan by a justice of the New York Supreme Court under section 61-a of the New York Banking Law (Consol. Laws, c. 2), and the distribution of assets in accordance with that plan, if he approved it. His approval could be a prejudice to the plaintiff only so...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.