PEABODY v. MARLBORO IMPLEMENT CO.

Nos. 6109, 6110.

72 F.2d 81 (1934)

PEABODY v. MARLBORO IMPLEMENT CO. (two cases).

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided June 11, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard J. Ganse, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Edwin A. Swingle and Ernest A. Swingle, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.


MARTIN, Chief Justice.

Appeals from judgments upon directed verdicts for the defendant in two related actions for damages for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident. The appellants are husband and wife and were plaintiffs below; their respective cases were consolidated for trial.

In the first case, Mrs. Peabody sued the Marlboro Implement Company, a corporation, alleging that one Howard I. Beall, while acting as agent and employee of the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases