1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 7 F.Supp.
  5. 7 F.Supp. 114 (1934)
 

THOMAS v. E. G. CURTIS SONS CO.

No. 5990.

7 F.Supp. 114 (1934)

THOMAS v. E. G. CURTIS SONS CO. et al.

District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

June 4, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Marx, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Wayne Van Osdol and Kennary & Minardo, all of Detroit, Mich., for defendants.

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The liability which the receiver is endeavoring to enforce in this cause is grounded upon the accommodation indorsement of E. G. Curtis Sons Company, a dissolved Michigan corporation. The bank knew that it was an accommodation indorsement.

Section 10 (i) of Act No. 327 of Michigan Public Acts of 1931 reads as follows: "Every corporation, unless otherwise provided, or inconsistent with the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases