1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 72 F.2d
  5. 72 F.2d 47 (1934)
 

ARTCRAFT SILK HOSIERY MILLS v. GOTHAM S. HOSIERY CO.

Nos. 5073, 5089.

72 F.2d 47 (1934)

ARTCRAFT SILK HOSIERY MILLS, Inc., v. GOTHAM SILK HOSIERY CO., Inc. GOTHAM SILK HOSIERY CO., Inc., v. ARTCRAFT SILK HOSIERY MILLS, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Rehearing Denied July 20, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifton V. Edwards, of New York City, Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., and Leon Edelson, of Philadelphia, Pa., for Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills.

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del. (Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., Edward W. Vaill, and Abraham I. Spiro, all of New York City, of counsel), for Gotham Silk Hosiery Co.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below, Gotham Silk Hosiery Company, Inc., hereafter called "Gotham," the owner of patent No. 1,824,636, granted September 22, 1931, to Roy E. Tilles for "Hosiery," filed a bill charging the Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc., hereafter called "Artcraft," with infringement thereof. In the same court, Gotham, the owner of patent No. 1,728,924, granted September 24, 1929, to Morris Buchsbaum for "Stockings," filed a second bill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases