1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 74 F.2d
  5. 74 F.2d 1018 (1934)
 

O. HOMMEL COMPANY v. JACKSON

No. 5495.

74 F.2d 1018 (1934)

O. HOMMEL COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, v. W. M. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellee.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

December 4, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weil, Christy & Weil, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (A. Leo Weil and A. Leo Weil, Jr., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellant.

Wm. H. Eckert and Smith, Buchanan, Scott & Gordon, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before WOOLLEY, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jackson sued the O. Hommel Company for breach of a contract of employment. He said he was discharged before the end of the term of his engagement. The O. Hommel Company said he resigned. The jury by their verdict for the plaintiff settled that question on evidence which, if sufficient, and on the law which, if correctly charged, validate the judgment.

The controversy revolved mainly around two issues: (a) Whether or not there was an accord and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases