1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 73 F.2d
  5. 73 F.2d 1015 (1934)
 

UNITED STATES v. BARTLETT

No. 7408.

73 F.2d 1015 (1934)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. William v. BARTLETT, Appellee.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 26, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., Mansel G. Gallaher, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Ernest D. Fooks, Atty. Dept. of Justice, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Will G. Beardslee, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, D. C., Randolph C. Shaw, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Thomas E. Walsh, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Armistead L. Boothe, Atty. Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D. C.

Wm. H. Wilson and Wm. Christensen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The record in this case does not present the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the judgment. Continental Nat. Bank et al. v. National City Bank of New York (C. C. A.) 69 F.2d 312. This being the only assignment of error presented by the appellant, the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases