BROGDEN v. HENRY

Patent Appeal No. 3272.

69 F.2d 978 (1934)

BROGDEN et al. v. HENRY.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 16, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steward & McKay, of New York City (Roy F. Steward and Clarence O. McKay, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Seth Thomas, of Fort Dodge, Iowa, C. W. Boyle, P. D. Cronin, and J. P. Wenchel and J. F. Mothershead, Dept. of Justice, Associate, both of Washington, D. C. (Irvin G. Menikheim, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


BLAND, Associate Judge.

Appellants have here appealed from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the Examiner of Interferences, awarding priority of invention in the subject-matter of the four counts involved to appellee, Henry. Broadly speaking, the invention in issue relates to the removal from fruits and vegetables of the residual poisons adhering thereto which result...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases