ALFRED HOFMANN, INC. v. TEXTILE MACH. WORKS

No. 5312.

71 F.2d 973 (1934)

ALFRED HOFMANN, Inc., v. TEXTILE MACH. WORKS.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Rehearing Denied July 16, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and Darby & Darby, all of New York City (Walter A. Darby, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Howson & Howson, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Dexter N. Shaw and Charles H. Howson, both of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The patent involved in this case was so thoroughly discussed in Judge Avis' opinion that we find ourselves in no position to improve on what he has said. After due consideration, we are of opinion the decree below should be affirmed, and affirmed on his opinion. In so doing, we note that this patent presents an unusual state of affairs.

What was known as the "cotton" knitting machine had been in use for many years. Its construction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases