1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 5 F.Supp.
  5. 5 F.Supp. 1009 (1934)
 

AERO-MAYFLOWER TRANSIT CO. v. WATSON

No. 2572.

5 F.Supp. 1009 (1934)

AERO-MAYFLOWER TRANSIT CO. v. WATSON, Com'r of Revenue.

District Court, E. D. Arkansas, W. D.

February 5, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brickhouse & Brickhouse, of Little Rock, Ark., and Watkins, Asbill & Watkins, of Atlanta, Ga., for complainant.

Louis Tarlowski, Sp. Counsel for State of Arkansas, of Little Rock, Ark. (Hal L. Norwood, Atty. Gen. of Arkansas, and Pat Mehaffy, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Arkansas, on the brief), for respondent.

MARTINEAU, District Judge.

Complainant, a Kentucky corporation, with its principal place of business in Indianapolis, Ind., is the owner of a fleet of trucks which it operates for hire as a contract carrier. In the regular course of business these trucks go into and through Arkansas, over its highways, but are engaged solely in interstate commerce.

Under the Arkansas statutes, complainant is required to pay registration and license

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases