1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 73 F.2d
  5. 73 F.2d 934 (1934)
 

IN RE OAKLEY

Patent Appeal No. 3371.

73 F.2d 934 (1934)

In re OAKLEY.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 24, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

V. M. Dorsey, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the Examiner, rejecting all the claims of appellant's application. The claims are all process claims and are numbered 1 to 5, inclusive. Claim 2 is illustrative of the subject-matter on appeal and reads as follows: "2. The hereinbefore described process of melting and refining high borosilicate glasses in a container of high alumina...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases