1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 63 F.2d
  5. 63 F.2d 892 (1933)
 

WARDMAN v. HUTCHINS

No. 5607.

63 F.2d 892 (1933)

WARDMAN et al. v. HUTCHINS.

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.

Decided February 6, 1933.

Rehearing Denied February 20, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Thew Wright and Philip Ershler, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Chas. H. Merillat and Levi H. David, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee, who was plaintiff below, brought his action against appellants, defendants below, to recover a deficiency judgment on a promissory note originally for $12,500. The declaration alleged that the note was secured by deed of trust on Washington real estate; that the real estate had been sold by the trustee under the deed of trust for default in interest and taxes; and that after applying the proceeds of the sale to the payment of the note, there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases