1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 63 F.2d
  5. 63 F.2d 853 (1933)
 

DRACKETT CHEMICAL CO. v. CHAMBERLAIN CO.

No. 6129.

63 F.2d 853 (1933)

DRACKETT CHEMICAL CO. v. CHAMBERLAIN CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 13, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter F. Murray, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Frank L. Zugelter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Wm. H. Parmelee, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Allen & Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Byrnes, Stebbins, Parmelee & Blenko, and George E. Stebbins, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judges.

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

The Drackett Chemical Company, having commenced, in 1921, the manufacture of a drainpipe solvent which consisted of caustic alkali and powered aluminum, was served by the Chamberlain Company with notice of alleged infringement of its patents to Isaacs, No. 1,010,768, and to Smith, No. 1,019,377. Thereupon the two companies entered into negotiations which culminated on December 1, 1922, in a license agreement granting to the Drackett Chemical...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases