1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 2 F.Supp.
  5. 2 F.Supp. 891 (1933)
 

FINN v. RAILROAD COMMISSION

No. 3485 K.

2 F.Supp. 891 (1933)

FINN et al. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.

District Court, N. D. California, S. D.

March 7, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert N. De Wolfe, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Arthur T. George, Ira H. Rowell, and Roderick B. Cassidy, all of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant Railroad Commission and for other defendants sued individually as members thereof.

Erwin P. Werner, City Atty., and Joseph T. Watson, Deputy City Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for Board of Public Utilities and Transportation of City of Los Angeles, and for other defendants sued individually as members thereof.

Before WILBUR, Circuit Judge, and ST. SURE and KERRIGAN, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before a three-judge court upon motions to dismiss the amended bill of complaint and to dissolve the temporary restraining order in behalf of the several defendants, upon an order to show cause why an interlocutory injunction should not be issued, and upon the merits, the defendants having answered without waiving their rights under the motion to dismiss. While we believe that there is merit in the motion to dismiss and that it should be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases