1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 2 F.Supp.
  5. 2 F.Supp. 890 (1933)
 

THE WHICH ONE

2 F.Supp. 890 (1933)

THE WHICH ONE.

District Court, E. D. New York.

February 1, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard W. Ameli, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Alfred C. McKenzie, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.

Louis Halle, of New York City (Milton R. Kroopf, of New York City, of counsel), for claimant.

GALSTON, District Judge.

The libelant seeks forfeiture of the British vessel Which One for violations of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 USCA § 1001 et seq.).

There are four causes of action set forth. The first relates to the importation into the United States of 62 barrels of scotch malt, part of a cargo of the vessel not included or described in the manifest of the vessel, and alleges that the master in charge of the vessel did not produce the manifest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases