1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 66 F.2d
  5. 66 F.2d 21 (1933)
 

ARTHUR v. EDMUNDS

No. 6894.

66 F.2d 21 (1933)

ARTHUR et al. v. EDMUNDS et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 15, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Dixon, of Miami, Fla., for appellants.

Henry K. Gibson and Bart A. Riley, both of Miami, Fla., for appellees.

Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

A bill in equity was removed to the District Court of the United States by some of the defendants therein on the ground of a separable controversy. The other defendants, denying the existence of such a controversy and the jurisdiction of the District Court, moved to remand the case to the state court. The judge in a written opinion expressed views indicating that he thought the movants for remand had no rights in the controversy, but the only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases