COCHRAN v. ESOLA

No. 6975.

67 F.2d 743 (1933)

COCHRAN et al. v. ESOLA, Marshal.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 21, 1933.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marshall B. Woodworth and Frank B. Lorigan, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

I. M. Peckham, U. S. Atty., and Leo C. Dunnell, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

In their petition for a rehearing, the appellants assert that the appellant Cochran "cannot be guilty of the offense charged," which this court has found was committed in the Eastern District of Washington, Northern Division, "for the simple reason that he was not in the Eastern District of Washington, Northern Division, at any of the times set forth in the indictment, as was uncontradictedly established by the evidence."

The appellants also contend...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases