IN RE HOLMES

Patent Appeal No. 3085.

63 F.2d 644 (1933)

In re HOLMES.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 27, 1933.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milans & Milans, of Washington, D.C. (Usina & Rauber, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

T.A. Hostetler, of Washington, D.C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

Appellant filed an application in the United States Patent Office for a patent on improvements in welded pipe and method of constructing the same. The examiner rejected product claims 1 to 6, inclusive, and allowed method claims 7 to 10, inclusive, and this decision as to the rejected claims was affirmed by the Board of Appeals. In doing so, the board cited the following references:

Murray et al., 1,399,307, December 6, 1921.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases