1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 2 F.Supp.
  5. 2 F.Supp. 689 (1933)
 

SIX COS. v. STINSON

No. G-191.

2 F.Supp. 689 (1933)

SIX COS., Inc., v. STINSON, Inspector of Mines, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada.

February 15, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, and Thelen & Marrin, all of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Gray Mashburn, Atty. Gen., of Nevada, and W. T. Mathews, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendants.

Richard J. Coffey, Dist. Counsel, Bureau of Reclamation, of Los Angeles, Cal., and H. H. Atkinson, U. S. Atty., of Reno, Nev., amici curiæ.

Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge, as a Statutory Court.

NORCROSS, District Judge.

The contention of plaintiff that defendant Stinson, as state inspector of mines, is without authority to compel plaintiff to desist from the use of gasoline-propelled trucks in underground excavations in the carrying out of the contract with the United States for the construction of Hoover Dam and incidental works in the Colorado river, rests upon a number of claims made which were briefly referred to in the opinion on motion for temporary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases