IN RE BLOCH

Patent Appeal No. 3096.

67 F.2d 572 (1933)

In re BLOCH.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 4, 1933.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. P. Wolhaupter, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


HATFIELD, Judge.

Under date of June 5, 1933, this appeal was originally disposed of by this court. 65 F.2d 268, 20 C. C. P. A. 1180. With reference to the only method claims involved, we said: "Claims 1 and 2 are the only method claims. At the time of the oral argument in this court, counsel for appellant stated that he would not contend that they were patentable. Accordingly, we will not consider them."

Claim 1 is illustrative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases