ROUHIB v. ZURBRICK

Nos. 6494, 6525.

67 F.2d 570 (1933)

ROUHIB v. ZURBRICK, District Director of Immigration. STAVRINOS v. NORTHRUP, Immigration Inspector, et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

November 7, 1933.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

In No. 6494:

O. Guy Frick, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Louis M. Hopping, of Detroit, Mich. (Gregory H. Frederick, of Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellee.

In No. 6525:

David D. Neiman, of Youngstown, Ohio (Kaufman & Neiman, of Youngstown, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Mare J. Wolpaw, of Cleveland, Ohio (Emerich B. Freed, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellees.

Before MOORMAN, HICKENLOOPER, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.


HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

While these cases were heard separately, they may be decided together. In neither case is there any proper bill of exceptions or statement of the evidence. It is true that in each case there is a so-called "Bill of Exceptions" stating that the respondent offered in evidence the original Department of Labor, Bureau of Immigration, file containing the record of hearing, as "Exhibit A," and the same was received in evidence; but this is wholly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases