1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 5 F.Supp.
  5. 5 F.Supp. 471 (1933)
 

UNITED STATES RADIATOR CORPORATION v. DOODY

No. 7833.

5 F.Supp. 471 (1933)

UNITED STATES RADIATOR CORPORATION et al. v. DOODY et al.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

September 12, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. P. Action and Wm. S. Furst, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for the motion.

J. H. Marvis and Francis J. Walsh, both of Philadelphia, Pa., opposed.

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This motion is based upon the double ground of want of equitable jurisdiction and the lack of jurisdiction in this court to entertain the bill. The first ground is very plausibly presented. The motive and purpose of the bill is merely to obtain a moratorium. Whatever might be urged to show that a moratorium purpose does not confer jurisdiction in equity, the question is no longer an open one. The well-known Pusey & Jones Case,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases