1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 5 F.Supp.
  5. 5 F.Supp. 435 (1933)
 

SMITH v. ROYAL INS. CO.

No. 19382.

5 F.Supp. 435 (1933)

SMITH v. ROYAL INS. CO., Limited.

District Court, N. D. California, S. D.

December 9, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Hanley, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Percy V. Long and Bert W. Levit, both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant.

KERRIGAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff is suing upon a policy of insurance in the sum of $15,000 upon his "leasehold interest" in certain real property on the shore of the town of Belvedere. The company refused payment of the policy on the ground that the plaintiff had no lease of the property and no insurable interest therein, which was the sole defense relied on at the time of the trial.

The nature of plaintiff's tenure of the property is most unusual and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases