ARROW-HART & HEGEMAN ELECTRIC CO. v. FEDERAL T. COM'N

No. 183.

65 F.2d 336 (1933)

ARROW-HART & HEGEMAN ELECTRIC CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 29, 1933.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Neave, of New York City, and Arthur L. Shipman, Charles Welles Gross, and Wallace W. Brown, all of Hartford, Conn., for petitioner.

Robt. E. Healy, Chief Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, Martin A. Morrison, Asst. Chief Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, and Everett F. Haycraft, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Respondent entered an order on a complaint filed under section 7 of the Clayton Act (15 USCA § 18) directing the Arrow-Hart & Hegeman Electric Company to divest itself of the common stock of Hart & Hegeman Manufacturing Company and Arrow Electric Company, two corporations engaged in the manufacture of electrical devices in competition in interstate commerce. Both manufacturing corporations had issues of preferred stocks which were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases